banner



Huawei Mate 20 Pro Photo Test

167Image Quality score UBERScoring/ranking arrangement name IQImage-Quality based scoring system CAMERA Huawei Mate twenty ProDevice brand and name Below $1200Category based on price 2018-10Device launch engagement

The Huawei Mate 20 Pro is Huawei's electric current high-end smartphone, and equally such, it packs an impressive camera system. In this review, we will go over the theoretical and real-world capabilities of this handset through the prism of our four mobile photography pillars: daylight, night, zoom, and ultrawide photography. Y'all tin also read the Mate twenty Pro smartphone review.

Learn more: what is our Camera IQ score?

Primal Camera specs and Uber HW Score

  • Rear Camera System (3 cameras)
    • Primary photographic camera: 27mm focal length, f/1.eight aperture, forty Megapixel Quad-Bayer Sony IMX600 sensor (7296×5472), Phase-detection AF
    • Zoom camera: 80mm (3X optical zoom), f/2.iv, 8 Megapixel, OIS
    • Ultrawide photographic camera: 16mm, f/two.2, auto-focus (macro-capable)

As you can see, the Huawei Mate 20 Pro is i of the most versatile mobile camera available which covers an incredible 16-80mm focal length and packs 1 of the largest sensor bachelor for mobile phones: the Sony IMX600 (27mm photographic camera).

This hardware support for common mobile photograph scenarios should assist this handset to perform very well in our tests. After feeding the data to our camera hardware scoring algorithm, the rear camera organisation of the Mate 20 Pro gets a smashing score on today'southward market:

156Prototype Quality score UBERScoring/ranking system name HWPrototype-Quality based scoring arrangement Camera Huawei Mate xx ProDevice brand and name Below $1200Category based on price 2018-10Device launch date

Learn more: what is our camera hardware score?

Image Quality Analysis

Important : let'south clarify some terminology nosotros'll exist using:

  • "image processing": software work that improves theparadigm information quality
  • "image filtering": software piece of work that changes thestyle (aesthetic) of the photo.
  • " context photo ": a greatapproximationofwhat nosotros see
    • Including how dark the scene actually is
    • Just to provide thecontext of the shot.
      • Not a quality benchmark

A note nearly theUber IQ Camera Score: our camera scoring system is based on four "Pillars" or sub-scores that provides much-needed nuance: day, dark, zoom and ultrawide photography.

Note that nosotros utilise the default "Auto" mode with a resolution of 3648×2736 (four:3). College resolutions tin be selected manually, but come with caveats linked to the Quad-Bayer sensor possible configurations.

Daylight photography: 179

The Huawei Mate xx takes outstanding photos, and on the surface, all high-end phones tend to do very well in broad daylight. However, when we look closer, differences start becoming more visible. If y'all want to compare ten-12 Megapixel images on a ~1-2 Megapixel screen, you lot have to crop!

Scene #1: details

In this shot, we can crop into high-detail areas to run across how the Mate 20 Pro handles particular preservation. Naturally, its 10 Megapixel resolution will put it at a slight disadvantage when compared to 12MP or 16MP cameras. But detail/texture preservation is also about HDR, exposure and image processing.

Context Shot

Context shot, cropped

As you can in this comparing, the iPhone XS Max has expert details preservation. Information technology is particularly visible if you compare both shots with the context image. The color reproduction of all the phones involved is skillful enough, and although some phones use heavier filtering to boost contrast, cipher comes out every bit terrible.

The OnePlus 6T can capture slightly additional sharpness and details in broad daylight, thanks to its 16 MP resolution. This phone also does use more than visible sharpening, simply the noise reduction seems less aggressive than the mate 20 Pro, which has some surfaces that are nearly flat-colored. Interestingly plenty, the OnePlus 6T isn't able to preserve more than of the fish-scalepatternsn from the house's siding when compared to iPhone XS.

Scene #2: High Dynamic Range (HDR)

Context Shot

The Sony camera does have better particular preservation in the shadowed expanse but struggles with the high contrast of the trees and breaks down a bit by making the leaves in the shadow style too nighttime with strong aliasing. Fortunately for Sony, few people would pick up on it because the tree is generally noisy.

It's fair to say that the Mate xx pro loses texture on the brown door and fence, not because of resolution, but considering of strong noise-reduction filtering. The Mate 20 Pro also significantly modified the lighting of the tree by brightening up the adumbral area using HDR.

In comparison, the Milky way Note ix shoots a photo that handles HDR with a more than natural wait and manages to preserve a more natural looking aspects to the trees and brown door and fence, at the price of having a slightly visible dissonance. It likewise handles the leaf shadows much better than the XPERIA XZ2, with less Aliasing.

Generally, both the Mate 20 Pro and OnePlus 6T have slightly improve exposure and HDR settings on things like street signs. In the case of the Mate twenty Pro, it's probably due to the Quad-Bayer sensor HDR manner. The OnePlus 6T produces a softer image, and some people might prefer that.

The XPERIA XZ2 and the Milky way Note nine had a general tendency to slightly over-expose some parts of the scene. However, in the 1000 scheme of things, the house and trees were the main subjects.

Huawei is 1 of the OEM with the most filtering on images, and depending on your personal preferences, you lot may like or dislike the style. What we do know is that in some instance, filtering images too much does lead to loss of details. It does not happen on every photo, but it is quite definitely a mode that you should enlightened of.

For case, when you take food pictures with scarlet meat, it's non unusual to run across meat beingness over-candy (no pun intended) and appear strangely red.

The meat did not wait similar this

Ane way to get around it is to utilize the "Pro" way, but it is not every bit convenient every bit the auto-mode. If you enable "Master AI," yous may get even more pronounced filtering. While I was cooking something, I took two pictures in Motorcar vs. Pro mode. Below, y'all tin can see the precipitous difference in image filtering. Both are shot with the Mate 20 Pro.

Auto manner (left) vs. Pro fashion (correct). Pro mode has more natural colors and lighting

Night light photography: 179

Smartphones well-nigh all have a tendency to brighten upwardly dark photos in comparing with what your eyes run into. It's a choice fabricated by phone manufacturers, and that explains why the context photo is most always darker: that'southward the all-time representation of what we are looking at.

Scene #1: details

Context shot: the scene looked like this

First, we tin can see that the Huawei Mate xx Pro has fabricated substantial changes to the brightness, colors, and mood of the scene. The yellowish lighting tint has turned into whiter lighting (street lights have a yellowish tint in the scene).

The Galaxy Notation 9 isn't perfect either but is a bit more true-blue (brightened) acquisition of the scene with warmer colors than there is in the scene. Think, when information technology comes to depression-light photography, brighter is not always amend, merely some added brightness can exist arguably more agreeable for telephone users, so information technology's to be expected. Elementary color-levels tweaking of the Note 9 photo would get us closer to a natural state.

If nosotros take a closer look, you can see that despite capturing a lot of details in a challenging scene, the Mate twenty Pro doesn't quite manage to preserve the scene's natural color hue. That's ane of the most difficult things to achieve for a smartphone because the sensor is (relatively) small and the low-cal then scarce.

Context shot, crop

In low-light, the Galaxy Note still displays a significant deviation with the contest. As soon every bit you inspect the photos from up-close, the data quality is visibly higher whether it is in color preservation, noise levels or details.

The plants left metal gate door highlight the superior low-light capture abilities of the Note 9 when compared to the Huawei Mate twenty Pro. Information technology is undeniable, and it is a trend that can exist constitute in shots after shots.

"MATE 20 PRO IS By and large BETTER THAN PIXEL iii AND THE IPHONE XS IN LOW-Calorie-free"

Yet, the Huawei Mate 20 Pro is no slouch when information technology comes to traditional low-light photography: we institute that the Mate xx Pro is generally better than Pixel 3 and the iPhone XS in low-light. We as well found that Huawei'south own P20 Pro was only a hair better, seemingly due to tuning differences.

Only like in daylight photos, the Mate 20 Pro does add a expert amount of filtering on the images. Some of it is to burnish the scene, and more than is added for extra contrast and sharpness. This significantly changes the nature of the scene, such as in the example beneath:

Context shot: what the scene looks like

Scene #2 : HDR at dark

Context Shot, what the scene looks like

Both the Mate twenty Pro and the Galaxy Note nine capture high-quality images, with some additional brightening, when compared to our context shot. The Mate 20 Pro makes more than modifications to the image's lightness, just it is possible to dial it back to a natural setting with a simple tweak of the color Levels.

However, the Mate 20 Pro did use a contrast filter that makes the lighting a bit harsher than the scene is, and this change cannot be easily undone. For reference, I'll show y'all the scene shot with a lower-priced telephone, the Honor View ten (~$380). As y'all tin can see, the View x's photographic camera sensor struggles with the natural color of the scene and is, of form, junior to higher-end camera phones in every fashion.

Honor View 10 photograph

If nosotros take a closer look at the center, nosotros can notice that the Mate 20 Pro has slightly fewer details when compared the Milky way Annotation ix. It is partly due to a stronger noise reduction attempt, but besides because of the x vs. 12 Megapixel resolutions.

The texture on the blinds, the siding under the upper-left window and on the tree's bark are visibly different. Both phones use artificial sharpening filters that create a "ringing result" most visible forth the branches to the right, merely the Mate twenty Pro has more filtering applied to the image.

All the same, the Huawei Mate 20 Pro tends to take better nighttime photos than prestigious handsets such as the Google Pixel three, the iPhone XS or the LG V40. Here's an example against the Google Pixel 3 in a classic depression-calorie-free photograph in a 0.5 LUX lighting environment  (nosotros'll review various long-exposure modes in an upcoming article). For reference, 0.5 LUX is a indicate where colors are starting to fade to human optics.

Context Shot

Both brighten the scene, but the Google Pixel actually reproduces the lighting level more than faithfully, which is good in terms of predictability (y'all can brighten the photo with a filter before sharing). But the real deviation comes when y'all take a closer look at the photo data from up shut.

The Mate xx Pro photo is sharper cheers to a mix of genuinely better epitome data and some image filtering, only not excessively. Even so, the original color hues have changed to the point where information technology would brand the Mate 20 Pro photograph hard to filter to a more natural-looking land.

Night Mode / Night Sight will be the object of a dissimilar article since it'due south an offshoot of low-light photography, but needs to exist placed in the proper context of taking a picture in ane/20 second vs 4-6 seconds.

Zoom photography: 103

When information technology comes to zoom capabilities, the Huawei Mate 20 Pro and the Huawei P20 Pro dominate the mobile photography landscape, thank you to an 80mm focal length (35mm equivalent) with Optical Epitome Stabilization (OIS). The photo samples will speak for themselves, equally there isn't a demand for lengthy descriptions when the difference is so sharp. We provided a context shot to show you what the original texture looked similar.

Context shot, what the scene looks like when zoomed in

Note that these toys are a chip more challenging than things like street signs because camera apps can more easily shine out straight lines (street signs and other flat surfaces) to add sharpness artificially. Organic textures stress the optical more, even if there's aught wrong to use algorithms to reconstruct details.

"THE MATE xx PRO WON EVERY ZOOM Challenge Nosotros THREW AT IT"

In fact, hither'southward a street scene that is also a good zoom test with the Mate xx Pro, the iPhone XS and the Pixel 3. Consider the mural painting, allow's zoom on information technology and audit ingather photos of the captures. Regardless, the Mate 20 Pro won every zoom challenge we threw at it.

Context Shot, we're going to zoom on the street art

When comparison both the iPhone XS and the Pixel 3 to the Mate xx Pro, the Mate twenty Pro's 3X optical zoom clearly has the edge. Also, it is interesting to see that the iPhone XS 2X optical zoom is sharply superior to Google's software-enhanced zoom, even though Google's algorithm should, in theory, attain near-parity with a 2X optical zoom, in ideal conditions.

From a color point of view, the iPhone XS has the about faithful color rendering in this shot, with the Mate xx Pro and the Pixel iii vastly changing the colour hues and saturation.

Ultrawide photo quality: 114

Having an ultrawide (~16mm) lens is we recollect so much more useful than having a 2X optical zoom, which is merely like stepping i yard forward. It's been a few years since LG introduced that feature and it's not bad to see others stepping in.

There are now a dozen ultrawide-capable smartphones, just at the high-end, the Mate 20 Pro and the LG V40 are the contenders. We compared both, and while the Mate 20 Pro has a slight reward in HDR daylight photos (check the trees), the LG V40's ultrawide lens performs noticeably better in dim lighting situations.

Overall, the LG V40 manages to gather more points and ends up keeping its crown equally the best ultrawide mobile camera.

Misc remarks

As we tested the phone, we besides noticed that the viewfinder preview and the terminal photos were sometimes very different. It's true that not all the settings tin can exist previewed easily, just nosotros found that competitors often did a ameliorate job than the Mate 20 Pro at this. Being able to preview a shot is an essential contributing gene to taking a ameliorate shot.

Conclusion and Uber IQ Photographic camera Score

MASTER_TITLE ULTIMATE 2018-ten mobile UBER CAMERA IQ BEST

ULTIMATE 2018-ten mobile UBER CAMERA IQ BEST ZOOMSpecific category being considered

Our scoring arrangement yielded a Uber IQ Camera score of 167, which makes the Huawei Mate 20 Pro today's ultimate mobile camera, thanks to an unmatched mix of quality and versatility. It also is the ultimate zoom photographic camera, a title that it shares with the Huawei P20 Pro.

Withal, if you look at the sub-scores, you will observe that this overall victory likewise comes with a few points worth nothing. You can view the full, interactive tables on our Uber IQ Camera score folio.

Learn more: what is our Camera IQ score, and full rankings

Uber IQ Camera Sub-scores
Day 179
Nighttime 179
Zoom 103
Ultrawide 114

The Huawei Mate 20 Pro photographic camera's existent forcefulness is its versatility/performance ratio. It may not be the best at everything, merely it is very expert at many things.

"AN UNMATCHED MIX OF QUALITY AND VERSATILITY"

There is one most important thing for Huawei to improve upon: to detect a style to serve the market of photographers who want less built-in filtering in their photos. That'southward particularly true if Huawei wants to take market share away from Apple. The "Natural" capture style of the iPhone is one of the most beloved features of its photographic camera.

Huawei has taken the industry past surprise by calculation hardware support for ultrawide and 3X zoom, and that's how information technology was able to surge its performance before any other OEM could react. At that place is no doubtfulness that 2019 will see other phone makers playing catch upwards. We saw information technology coming a few years ago when LG introduced ultrawide for the offset fourth dimension.

Thanks for reading our Huawei Mate 20 Pro Photographic camera image quality review! Nosotros promise that you establish it interesting and had enough data to make up one's mind if it's for you lot or not. Leave a comment by clicking the comment icon or Read the Huawei Mate 20 Pro smartphone review

More in-depth mobile photographic camera reviews are coming, so connect with us on Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube to be notified of new scores, and more. For the latest handset reviews and news, add united states of america to your Google News by clicking on the "Follow" button there.

Filed in . Read more nigh Camera Benchmarks, Huawei, Huawei Mate twenty Pro and Mobile Camera Reviews.

Source: https://www.ubergizmo.com/reviews/huawei-mate-20-pro-camera-review/

Posted by: andersonhistiamseent.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Huawei Mate 20 Pro Photo Test"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel